Medium Large

Monday, November 30, 2009

Posted in 1 by cesco7 on November 30, 2009

About these ads

13 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. JustAGuyGuy said, on November 30, 2009 at 12:41 pm

    Ah, so she knew too much.

    I wonder what the jack-in-the-box did though.

    • Andrew said, on December 1, 2009 at 8:55 am

      He was a Charlie-in-the-Box.

      • NoVan said, on December 2, 2009 at 8:08 pm

        A Victor Charlie?! Call in the nampalm!

  2. Don Tyler said, on November 30, 2009 at 3:50 pm

    Where’s the island of misfit ex-spouses? WHERE?!?!

  3. Mollyscribbles said, on November 30, 2009 at 7:51 pm

    This explains so much. I mean, most of ‘em seem like they could either be fixed or given to kids who don’t care if they get a bird that likes to swim, but the doll . . . she was too normal.

  4. Pirk said, on November 30, 2009 at 11:02 pm

    (from wikipedia)

    “A Dolly for Sue (as she calls herself)” is a seemingly normal girl rag doll with red hair and a red gingham (checkered) dress. Her misfit problem is never explained on the special, but was revealed on NPR’s Wait Wait… Don’t Tell Me! news quiz show (broadcast December 8, 2007). The show revealed that Rudolph’s producer, Arthur Rankin Jr., says Dolly’s problem was psychological, caused from being abandoned by her mistress and suffering depression from feeling unloved.

    not trying to dispute your strip, just wikied rudolph to jog my memory and thought I’d share the interesting info I found

    • Vyolynce said, on December 1, 2009 at 8:28 am

      Clearly that’s a typo. It should read “abandoned AS A mistress”.

    • Toronto said, on December 1, 2009 at 4:56 pm

      Wasn’t that Misfit Toy Story 2?

  5. Braced Rhombus said, on December 1, 2009 at 8:17 am

    Ces, where’s the strip you created that explained why the doll was on the island?

  6. John Warner said, on December 2, 2009 at 8:15 am

    The “Jo-Ann Fabrics” reference is a nice touch and makes this work for me.

  7. Frank said, on May 4, 2010 at 2:38 pm

    Oh, phew, it’s not a little girl! For a while I thought this was a pedophilia joke. But as long as it’s just an unholy living simulacra of a little girl, it’s OK.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 468 other followers

%d bloggers like this: