Medium Large

Monday, April 26, 2010

Posted in Uncategorized by cesco7 on April 26, 2010

About these ads

10 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Bryan said, on April 26, 2010 at 2:55 pm

    Was Lalo Alcaraz operating the video camera? All three comics are shit.

  2. KarMann said, on April 26, 2010 at 3:29 pm

    I wonder what’s in Tinsley’s cup besides coffee?

  3. andy said, on April 26, 2010 at 4:08 pm

    I think this would do the pair of them a world of good.

  4. Nunuv Yerbiznezz said, on April 26, 2010 at 6:21 pm

    Did they have a threesome with the guy who does “State of the Union”?

  5. Michael said, on April 26, 2010 at 6:42 pm

    Or the world a pair of good. I, so hate Mallard Filmore for its spastic unimaginative irrelevant knee jerk conservative commentary. It isn’t the conservative Doonesbury by a hundred miles. Prickly city though I feel is a bit more fair and treats its characters as more than cardboard cutouts. Ramirez who cartooned for the LA times would have been a better pick.

  6. Howie Feltersnatch said, on April 27, 2010 at 6:16 am

    Did the artwork in Prickly City recently improve *slightly*? I thought maybe Stantis went off the sauce or something, but it seems just a skosh less scribbly lately. Like instead of the messy scrawl on the girl’s face that’s meant to represent enormous lips, now there’s something more lippy and less scribbly.

  7. o0o said, on April 27, 2010 at 10:16 am

    hahaha! i love the 1-2-3 joke pileup in that last frame. that’s good comedy writing!

  8. rewinn said, on April 27, 2010 at 11:17 am

    The text has no unneeded words AND a punchline – unlike “Mallard Fillmore”.

    The art tells the story – unlike “Prickly City”.

    There’s a reason there is almost no conservative humor.

  9. Blinky the Wonder Wombat said, on April 27, 2010 at 2:01 pm

    Mallard Fillmore is a heap of steaming DS that only gets newspaper space because some editor thinks it “balances” out Doonesbury’s supposed liberal stance.

    Prickly City, on the other hand is not conservative but Libertarian. True the artwork can be attrocious, but its not dogmatic and sometimes doesn’t even contain political content. BTW, the current arc bashing the Tea Partiers should remove any doubt that this isn’t a conservative strip.

    • yellojkt said, on April 29, 2010 at 10:56 am

      Prickly City not dogmatic? It has more talking points that Fox News editorial meeting.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 857 other followers

%d bloggers like this: