Skip to content
Skip to search - Accesskey = s
Follow on Twitter @fmarciuliano Follow on Facebook
4 comments
Subscribe to comments with RSS.
That would be either Duck Amuck (1953) or Rabbit Rampage (1955).
Duck Amuck, clearly. We do not talk about Rabbit Rampage. We do not.
And will be henceforth referred to as The-Cartoon-Which-Must-Not-Be-Named.
In the third panel, why didn’t you put the name “NINA” in the hair on the back of his head. Because THAT’S WHAT CARTOONISTS DO, right?
And who is this guy talking to? It’d make a lot more sense if he had a Bluetooth earpiece on, right?
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of follow-up comments via email.
Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.
Join 159 other followers
That would be either Duck Amuck (1953) or Rabbit Rampage (1955).
Duck Amuck, clearly. We do not talk about Rabbit Rampage. We do not.
And will be henceforth referred to as The-Cartoon-Which-Must-Not-Be-Named.
In the third panel, why didn’t you put the name “NINA” in the hair on the back of his head. Because THAT’S WHAT CARTOONISTS DO, right?
And who is this guy talking to? It’d make a lot more sense if he had a Bluetooth earpiece on, right?